
Andy Zaltzman was born in obscurity in 1974. He has been a sporadically-acclaimed stand-up comedian since 1999, and has appeared regularly on BBC Radio 4. He is currently one half of TimesOnline’s hit satirical podcast The Bugle, alongside John Oliver (The Daily Show with John Stewart). He also writes for The Times newspaper, and is the author of Does Anything Eat Bankers? (And 53 Other Indispensable Questions For The Credit Crunched).
Zaltzman’s love of cricket outshone his aptitude for the game by a humiliating margin. He once scored 6 in 75 minutes in an Under-15 match, and failed to hit a six between the ages of 9 and 23. He would have been ideally suited to Tests, had not a congenital defect left him unable to play the game to anything above genuine village standard. Aged 21, when fielding at deep midwicket, he dropped the same batsman three times in fifteen minutes, and has not been selected by England before or since
Zaltzman’s World Cup blog is here
« Multistat: 134 | | Australia have fluffed their chance at immortality »
November 29, 2011
Posted by Andy Zaltzman on 11/29/2011
Players with pairs lasting two or three balls XI
Ajit Agarkar: the man whose shrine can be found in one C Martin household
© AFPI sat down this morning to write about the phenomenal conclusion of the Mumbai Test. However, a trawl for some tasty statistics sent me a little off-piste. I could have returned to the piste, but I did not, and I will therefore discuss the match not in this blog, but in the relaunch episode of my World Cricket Podcast, due out later this week.
Instead, I have another Confectionery Stall XI for you, arising from investigations into R Ashwin’s Wankhede hundred – a historically momentous innings which means that Sachin Tendulkar and Ashwin between them have now scored 100 international centuries. No wonder the crowd went noisily berserk.
Ashwin became the fifth frontline Indian bowler this millennium to score a Test hundred, after Harbhajan (twice), Irfan Pathan, Kumble and Agarkar. In the two previous millennia, the only Indian bowler to have scored a hundred batting at No. 8 or lower was Kapil Dev, who scored two of his eight Test tons there.
Ashwin’s was far from the most unexpected of these lower-order successes. Ajit Agarkar can safely claim that honour. He might have had one first-class hundred under his belt when he walked to the wicket at Lord’s in 2002, but he also had nine runs in his previous six Test innings under the same belt, plus a shining belt-buckle engraved with details of a frankly heroic eight ducks in 18 Test innings to date.
Half of that quacky flock of eight ducks constituted a world-record-breaking sequence of four consecutive first-ballers in Australia in 1999-2000, a run of instantaneous ineptitude broken when he defiantly stodged out for a marathon two-ball duck in his next innings, enabling him to complete back-to-back pairs totalling five balls at the crease. It takes something special to record a King Pair. It takes something almost divine to follow it up with a three-ball pair.
At Lord’s, the game was already lost, but Agarkar defied both a useful England attack and his own career average of 7.4 to plank a statistically gobsmacking 109 not out. It remained Agarkar’s only Test score of more than 50. Few Test hundreds can have emerged so unexpectedly from a seemingly inescapable swamp of statistical precedent.
He later launched a similarly ingenious cricketing ambush with the ball. In the Adelaide Test of 2003-04, having lulled the Australians into a mathematically-justified sense of false baggy-green security by never having taken more than three wickets in an innings in 17 previous Tests over five years, Agarkar kebabed his way through them with 6 for 41, to set up one of India’s finest victories. He never took more than three wickets in an innings again – in fact, after that series, he never took more than two wickets in a Test.
Agarkar, a consistently effective ODI performer, thus established himself as unquestionably the greatest all-round one-off-flash-in-the-pan Test player of all time: 26 Tests – one major success with the bat, one major success with the ball. Of the 41 cricketers who have converted their only Test fifty into a century, Agarkar played more than twice as many Tests as the next man on the list. And of all the bowlers who have taken 50 wickets or more in Tests, only Agarkar can claim that on the one and only occasion on which he took more than three wickets in an innings, he turned that success into a six-wicket masterclass.
Agarkar’s hit-and-run Test career, and in particular his monumental, gravity-defying run of rapid-fire ducks, has inspired the Confectionery Stall Players Of My Cricket-Watching Lifetime Who Have Been Out For Pairs Lasting A Total Of Just Two Or Three Balls XI.
(I have selected the batsmen based on the quality of their careers, and the bowlers for their all-round ineffectiveness of the specific match in which they harvested their double-quick-time pair. At its best, this is a well-balanced XI that could challenge most teams, particularly with the bat. At its worst, it would be all out for 0 in 2.2 overs in both innings.)
Mike Atherton: 3 balls, v South Africa, Johannesburg, 1999-2000
Four years earlier on the same ground, South Africa had failed to dismiss the Lancashire Limpet in 10 hours 43 minutes and 492 balls of match-saving resistance. This time, they did so twice in nine minutes of batting, encompassing three balls, only one of which did not result in Atherton trudging off to the sound of Fate giggling to herself about what a neat line in irony she can peddle when the mood takes her.
Virender Sehwag: 2 balls, v England, Edgbaston, 2011
An uncharacteristic match strike-rate of 0 for the Delhi Devastator proved one of the most immutable rules in the scientific universe: if you are thrown straight into a Test match after four months out of the game following a major operation, against the world’s strongest pace attack in swinging conditions, in a crumbling team, you will probably struggle, even if you are, in different circumstances, capable of hitting a run-a-ball triple-century off Steyn, Ntini, Morkel and Kallis. And Harris.
Kim Hughes: 3 balls, v West Indies, Melbourne, 1984-85
It is fair to say that resigning the baggy-green captaincy did not help Kim Hughes rediscover the twinkling form that had helped him score an eye-popping undefeated hundred against Holding, Roberts, Garner and Croft, scored whilst Australia were being skittled for 198 at the MCG on Boxing Day 1981. In his first Test after his tearful departure from high office, Garner and Marshall dismissed him for a golden duck and a seven-ball 2 (a perfectly respectable innings against the mid-1980s West Indians, to be fair). In the next match, back at the scene of his previous triumph, Walsh snared him second ball, and Garner condemned him to another first-ball blob, and Hughes’ Test career was over.
Mark Waugh: 3 balls, v Sri Lanka, Colombo, 1992
Probably the most elegant three-ball pair of all time. The marginally younger Waugh bounced back in the following Test in Moratuwa, improving considerably to register an equally elegant nine-ball pair.
Alec Stewart: 3 balls, v Australia, Brisbane, 2002-03
England began the 2002-03 Ashes with miniscule hopes of victory, after a generation of baggy-green pummellings. By the end of day one of the series, those hopes were barely visible with an electron microscope, and England’s humiliation was complete when Stewart, one of England’s doughtiest servants through those lean Ashes years, suffered a Warne-induced golden duck to complete his three-ball pair.
Adam Gilchrist: 2 balls, v India, Kolkata, 2001-02
The world’s most destructive bat hit the ball two fewer times than its owner’s pads managed to in the momentous Eden Gardens epic. After a characteristically annihilative hundred in the series opener, Gilchrist was trapped in front in the middle of a hat-trick by Harbhajan late on day one. Four wild and crazy days later, he was pinned again, this time by Tendulkar, as the little Master ‒ who has averaged two Test wickets a year over his 22-year career ‒ took three in 13 balls. I was following the drama on Ceefax in my flat in London. Despite the drawback of only being able to see the scorecard change every five minutes or so, it remains one of the most exciting cricket matches I’ve ever watched.
Gilchrist was out lbw for 1 in both innings of the final Test. He had only been leg before once in his first 15 Tests before Eden Gardens. He was not out in this manner again for another 34 Tests. He had clearly learnt the valuable lesson that hitting the ball with his bat was a better tactic than hitting it with his legs.
Andrew Flintoff: 3 balls, v India, Headingley, 2002
Having ploughed through 27 overs for the solitary and distinctly unglamorous wicket of Sanjay Bangar, the Lancashire Leviathan would have hoped for more than three balls’ worth of batting. But Flintoff was still some way from cracking Test cricket, and he became another Harbhajan first-ball lbw victim, before, in England’s follow-on, being snaffled second ball by Zaheer Khan to register his eighth duck in 21 Tests. It would be almost a year before Flintoff reappeared in the Test arena. In the interim, he had acquired some crackers. And he started cracking things.
Justin Kemp: 3 balls, v West Indies, Jamaica, 2001
Not only did Kemp somehow contrive to be comfortably out-batted by Courtney Walsh in his final Test, but he also picked up only one wicket in 34 overs on a seamer-friendly pitch. Kemp was promptly dispatched into the Test match undergrowth by the South African selectors, whence he would emerge only four-and-a-half years later, for a solitary valedictory Test.
Ajit Agarkar: 3 balls, v Australia, Sydney, 1999-2000
Selected for his three-ball Sydney double-bloop rather than his king-pair pratfall in Melbourne on the anti-strength of his SCG bowling – 0 for 95 in 19 overs of persistent uselessness as Australia clonked their way to 552 for 5. Next time he faced the Baggy Greens, Agarkar backed-up his five-innings-in-six-balls nano-batting heroics with another pair of quacks in Mumbai, although this double dud took a stately 27 balls to complete. He finished his career with eight ducks in 16 Test innings against Australia – no one has scored so many noughts in so few innings against any opposition.
Rangana Herath: 3 balls, v Pakistan, Galle, 2000
In his third Test, Herath gave the cricket world one of its least impressive all-round personal performances – his one-ball first innings and two-ball second sandwiched a 36-over trundle of 0 for 115, making him the only player ever to score a pair with the bat and concede a wicketless century with the ball in the same match. The Sri Lankan selectors took note of the history being made before their eyes, and did not pick Herath again for almost four years.
Maninder Singh: 3 balls, v Pakistan, Karachi, 1982-83
In a strikingly ineffective debut, Maninder began as he meant to go on – on a mission to become statistically the worst batsman ever to play 20 or more Tests. Sadly, his average of 3.80 in 35 Tests has since been eclipsed by a man with an even greater devotion to being unable to hit cricket balls, the immortal Chris Martin (2.47 in 60 matches), but Maninder’s international bow also featured 23 wicket-free overs as India were mercilessly pounded by their arch rivals.
Remarkably, Maninder was batting as high as 10. The selectors, understandably, had assumed that they could not possibly have found a less capable batsman than the 4.6-averaging Dilip Doshi. They were wrong. Doshi outshone his tail-end compadré. His pair lasted four balls.
|
|||||
Posted by: Shen on 11/29/2011
World Cricket Podcast, woo yeah!!!!
Posted by: Mogomotsi Lebotse on 11/29/2011
I'm glad to see that Chris Martin is mentioned somewhere here, but i cannot believe that he did not maje this XI. You must have pulled your stats wrong because, as soon as I saw the title, I assumed that Mr Martin will be leading this attack. Since he is not, this list must somehow be invallid. and where is Mpumelelo Mbangwa (Zim), who I believe is giving Chris Martin some stiff challenge for the worst test batsman ever?
Posted by: IG on 11/29/2011
A very sound collection Andy...although Gilchrist's was a cheat to be honest. The ball pitched a full 68 yards outside leg (as opposed to miles) and he even hit it, but was given out LBW by the umpire who also happened to be Harbhajan Singh's (the bowler) Uncle's nephew from his mother's side of the family.
Posted by: Anonymous on 11/29/2011
haha...fun read!
Posted by: mickeyzim9 on 11/29/2011
@Mogomotse Lebotse; I am sure you mean Chris Mpofu and yes, he is giving The Phantom a good run for his money
Posted by: Rajat mehra on 11/29/2011
Awesome!!!!.......Just awesome.......only you could have done it Andy!
Posted by: JR on 11/29/2011
Didnt Ryan Harris get a king pair in the 2nd test of 2010/11 ashes series, twice LBW when he refered both on DRS, but still sent on his way. Is that not the first king pair with DRS in bith decisions?
Posted by: Ed the Red on 11/29/2011
May I be the first to complain about the lack of Sachin Tendulkar in this XI?
Failing to score 100 for umpteen innings in a row must surely qualify him, even if he doesn't technically meet the criterion? Tendulkar must be in every XI every proposed - it's the law!
Posted by: Nishit on 11/29/2011
Which country has the most international cricket grounds?
Posted by: Rakesh on 11/29/2011
Zaltzman is back to form!
Posted by: AK on 11/29/2011
A petition on behalf of Messrs Courtney Walsh and Glen McGrath. "We believe we have done enough with 43 and 35 blobs respectively to top the charts. While we may not have met with the exalted standards set by our fast bowling co-conspirator Mr. Martin (on 6 pairs), we have a credible 4 pairs and 3 pairs respectively. While we believe that our omission from this exalted all time list may be a genuine oversight, we request the arbiters to kindly reconsider this decision. We are happy to provide references of our exploits from players, pundits and paying public alike."
Posted by: Faheem Ahmed on 11/29/2011
I'm amazed to see no Marvan Atapattu in XI. who can forget his famous start.
Posted by: Vivek on 11/29/2011
@IG, you mean the umpire was his brother/cousin? "Distant relative" would have been smarter than that feeble attempt at humour you made no?
Posted by: Ruschhil on 11/29/2011
The Immortal Chris Martin!! Haha
Posted by: Ramesh on 11/29/2011
Dilip Doshi outshone Maninder by getting a pair off 4 balls? ROFL. How do you manage to unearth such bizarre stats? Hats off!!!
Posted by: venbas on 11/29/2011
Agarkar is a true stand out performer. The guy with the fastest ODI 50 (Indian), Test Century at Lords, 6-for at Adelaide that decimated a peak strength Australia team and then the Mumbai duck sobriquette so rightfully earned on top of a string of Zeroes...Legendary stuff mate!!!
Posted by: Mouche on 11/29/2011
Ryan Harris' king pair against England at Adelaide in the 2010/11 Ashes should crack a special mention. Given 'out' 4 times in the space of 2 ball for the test. Given out LBW by the on field umpires and then given out again upon review in both innings.
Posted by: nil on 11/29/2011
gayle scored a 180 ball 32 in that justin kemp test. he was that slow back then?? :O
Posted by: TheCentralGovernment on 11/29/2011
You made the right choice, its high time the Greatest all-round one-off-flash-in-the-pan Test player of all time was finally recognized ...
@IG, not sure if troll or ....
Posted by: chris on 11/29/2011
Superb. I particularly loved the one about Mark Waugh.
Posted by: wolf on 11/29/2011
The worst batsmen to ever get a 50 has to be McGrath. He was challenging the title for worst ever early in his career then worked hard at it to become merely terrible.
Posted by: Anonymous on 11/29/2011
...defiantly stodged out for a marathon two-ball duck....
LOL
Posted by: Rahul on 11/29/2011
Ajit sucks.
Posted by: Sumeet Saurabh on 11/29/2011
Laughing fit! help!
Posted by: Huzefa on 11/29/2011
hahahahhahah.... love the way you put statistics in a completely different perspective. Was laughing loudly at Herath's misery and Sri Lankan selectors taking note of the history being made before their eyes... too good.
Posted by: PK on 11/29/2011
Nice work, Andy. Not normally a fan of yours, but I'll have to start reading your stuff again.
Posted by: Piers on 11/29/2011
I thought that Graham Gooch would be a shoe-in for his pair in his first test, but when I checked I found he'd lasted far too long to qualify - 10 balls in two innings. And he wasn't opening either.
Posted by: Aditya on 11/29/2011
Chris martin probably didn't back up any of his extraordinary batting pairs with some extraordinary bowling performances like the guys on the list have done
Posted by: psswain on 11/30/2011
Few days ago martin scored a quick half century at top of the order for a county team !
Posted by: Sebastian Booth on 11/30/2011
IG, pretty much what I was going to say. The article got it wrong - he DID in fact hit the ball... Nothing wrong with the second dismissal though, Gilchrist himself even said in his autobiography.
Posted by: Andy on 11/30/2011
lmao at IG's comment
Posted by: S.J.R.Niles on 11/30/2011
I Believe that Marvan Attapatu's initiation in to Test Cricket also included a number of Ducks.
Posted by: Mangesh on 11/30/2011
Andy, must be a lot of hard work to get some of those quirky stats out. BTW, in the next Australian tour, Agarkar raised his bat after he scored his first run as if he completed a hundred!
Posted by: Aaron on 11/30/2011
@IG: You made that part up about the ump being related to Harbhajan, didn't you? Because as far as I can remember, the ump was AV Jayprakash, and he is not related to Singh by any stretch of the imagination.
@Andy: Missing in this list are big bunnies like Ambrose, McGrath, Hoggard, Harmison, etc. :)
Posted by: Satish on 11/30/2011
@IG : Do you suggest Andy to go and search each and every decision whether it is correct or wrong and then post his stats? I guess he is capable of that too.. Andy, could we get the list of batsmen who were cheated most by the umpires?
Posted by: DG on 11/30/2011
"a 36-over trundle of 0 for 115"... hahahaha. Gold. I'm going to have to start slipping "trundle" into conversations as a verb more frequently.
Posted by: Anonymous on 11/30/2011
because of series of ducks by agarkar....he is famoulsly known as 'Bombay Duck'
Posted by: Mani Sekaran on 11/30/2011
Hi Andy,
It seems that you have forgotten Maravan Attapattu
Marvan Atapattu scored five ducks in his first six Test innings, which included two pairs which too in his debut season.
Considering that he went on to play 90 tests, scored 5502 with 16 tons, he at the least deserves the position of 12th man
Posted by: NALINWIJ on 12/01/2011
Amazing that 3 Indian's -Shewag,Agarkar and M.singh made the list but legends such as Chandrasekher and Doshi [brief honorable mention] missed out.
Posted by: Anonymous on 12/03/2011
jimmy amaranath's telecode 000100 aganist windies (83-84)
Posted by: Kieron Azure on 12/07/2011
Well for all those who believe Harbhajan didn't deserve the Kolkata hat-trick since Gilly hit the ball so the lbw was invalid, I can only point out that the same thing happened to Harbhajan at Trentbridge in 2011 against the bowling of Broad. He clearly hit it yet was given lbw.
What's more, Harbhajan was the middle victim of the hattrick, just like Gilly was!
Karma sure has a way of coming back- that too after a decade!
Posted by: Paritosh on 12/08/2011
Agarkar is easily one of the best allrounder in ODIs. Ya, he could not perform well in tests but that doesn't prove that he is a bad player. He is one of the most successful bowler of India and has played a lot of handy innings coming late in ODIs. I also remember his 95 in an inning when he batted at no. 3.
Posted by: AC on 12/16/2011
IG: Grow up. Aus has since won the infamous Sydney Test with enough umpiring errors for a decade and you wail about one decision?
| Post your comment | |||
|
|
Have a question you want to put to Andy Zaltzman? A recommendation you’d like to pass along to him? A request for a Zaltz Stat? A topic you’d like to see him tackle? Send it in here
| May 2012 |
| April 2012 |
| March 2012 |
| February 2012 |
| January 2012 |
| December 2011 |
| November 2011 |
| October 2011 |
| September 2011 |
| August 2011 |
| July 2011 |
| June 2011 |
| May 2011 |
| April 2011 |
| March 2011 |
| February 2011 |
| January 2011 |
| December 2010 |
| November 2010 |
| October 2010 |
| September 2010 |
| August 2010 |
| July 2010 |
| June 2010 |
| May 2010 |
| April 2010 |
| March 2010 |
| February 2010 |
| January 2010 |
| December 2009 |
| November 2009 |
| October 2009 |
| September 2009 |
| August 2009 |
| July 2009 |
| June 2009 |
| May 2009 |
| April 2009 |
| March 2009 |
| February 2009 |
| January 2009 |
| December 2008 |
| November 2008 |
