Beyond the Blues
December 26, 2009
Posted by Aakash Chopra on 12/26/2009 in Ranji Trophy, 2009-10
The problem with home-and-away games

Dear friends,

Till a few years ago, the knock-out matches of the Ranji Trophy were held on an home-and-away basis. Teams hosting the match had two major advantages. Preparing the pitch was their prerogative and they had the support of the home crowd. Those were days when people turned up in big numbers to watch a first-class game. And if that game happened to be between Mumbai and Delhi with all the big players available, the atmosphere would match up to an international game, or so I’m told.

Gradually the crowds starting dwindling and the home teams abused their right to prepare the track. They started preparing tracks to suit their strengths without keeping the larger interest of the game in mind. A spin-heavy attack would prepare a dustbowl to have an upper hand; similarly the team which was banking on their batsmen to win the game, started dishing out feather beds. A first-innings lead was enough to decide the winner and they were under no pressure to prepare tracks which would produce results.

The BCCI tried to counter this by appointing a chief curator to overlook the preparations. But that wasn’t enough because the chief curator didn’t have complete control over the ground staff. He would give suggestions which very few who would obey, especially when it meant putting their team in jeopardy.

Hence the BCCI was forced to have neutral venues for the knock-out matches. In my view, it was a wonderful move because it negated home advantage and tested teams on a neutral playing ground. It also meant that the knock-outs were held at Test centres and if prepared properly, most of them are capable of preparing a result-oriented pitch.

I have no doubt in my mind that Delhi’s win in the Ranji Trophy in 2007-08 had a lot to do with neutral venues. We would have fallen way short of Uttar Pradesh in the final if the match was in Lucknow or Kanpur, and had they prepared a dustbowl. The track we played on in Mumbai was a player’s delight. The ball swung appreciably for the first couple of days before becoming a great track to bat on day three and four. Since the track offered a lot of bounce, the spinners were also involved throughout the game.

From this year on, the neutral venues have again been done away with, and we are back to old ways. Perhaps it's been done to attract the crowds to support the hosts. To negate the home advantage in terms of preparing the pitch, the BCCI has now appointed a neutral curator for all four venues.

But is it fair to expect a track in Rohtak or Palam to play like the one at Wankhede? Incidentally, the venues for the four quarter-finals do not have the required infrastructure to cover the matches. Hence, while league games were covered live, the quarter-finals won't be. This move may perhaps bring a few people to the ground but has, in fact, denied many more an opportunity to watch the game on the telly.

Wish you Merry Christmas and a Happy New year.

Comments (3)
Posted by: Arvind at December 26, 2009 5:25 AM

The problem is not that difficult to solve, but the only thing that comes in the way is the greed of certain people.

1. Make it mandatory for the international cricketers to represent their state team for at least certain number of matches each year. Would you go to watch a Karnataka v/s Mumbai match if Dravid and Tendulkar are playing, or would you enjoy watching 2 teams of 11 no-names and discarded cricketers play each other? --> This is not going to happen, because of BCCI's greed.
2. Abolish the "system" of quarter-, semi-, and finals. The topper at the end of the league takes the trophy. PERIOD. All European football leagues follow this system, and teams play EVERY game seriously, not just to "qualify" for the next round.
3. The league should be home-and-away, away performances have more weightage. For example, if a draw earns more points for the away team, it might deter the home team from making a "drawish" pitch.

Posted by: atul jain at December 26, 2009 10:44 AM

Akash has made very thoughtful remarks. Indeed it would be very difficult to work out a balanced solution, where everything is taken care of.
1. Big venues provide good facility and pitch
2. But, smaller venues need to be encouraged, for their upliftment and reach.
3. Neutral venues are beneficial but Home and away concept bring loyalty factor which makes it more interesting.

May be solution lies somewhere in between, that is
1. national players must be part of NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP at some stage.
2. Local publicity thru radio,newspaper is must
3. At any time there are about 30-40 players who are or have donned Indian colors. Some of them are playing these matches hence, their names should be prominently displayed in publicity, to attaract crowd.
4. For pitches, today , readymade drop in pitches are available. That concept may be introduced in India also. Please note that our Board is the richest, they can afford it.
5. Direct telecast from QF onwards should be must.

Posted by: Vidyadhar Akkaraju at December 31, 2009 3:41 AM

The format of the Ranji Trophy is pretty flawed. Too many teams play for the first innings lead. The system encourages dull batting and very little incentive for real competitive cricket. The points system should be revamped with points for scoring rates, bowling points and victories. Let each group play home and away in a season, within the group. More matches with lesser number of teams.

Name: Email Address:
Comments: characters left
Aakash Chopra opened for India in 10 Tests, forming a potent all-Delhi combination with Virender Sehwag during India's tour of Australia in 2003-04. He also made his mark as an exceptional close-in fielder. He writes columns for the Hindustan Times and Cricinfo, and is the author of Beyond the Blues, his season diary for 2007-08, when Delhi became Ranji champions. His website is here, and his Twitter feed here
Latest News
Specials
© ESPN EMEA Ltd