Different Strokes

July 8, 2008
Posted by Mike Holmans on 07/08/2008 in Mike Holmans
Eng v NZ: Two's company

After five months of close combat at both ends of the earth, England and New Zealand have confirmed what the formbook had told us before we started: England are better at Tests and worse at fifty-over cricket than New Zealand are.

Overall, the standard of play in the Tests was pretty low. Far too many batsmen on both sides simply gave their wickets away; several innings were rescued from ignominy by lower order bats shovelling manfully to get out of the hole dug by the alleged specialists. Every Test featured at least one team (and usually both) losing five top order wickets for under 80, more usually under 40.

A couple of those collapses were induced by magnificent bowling - Sidebottom at Wellington and Anderson at Trent Bridge would have demolished most batting line-ups – but most were evidence of inadequate technique or application. On the other hand, they led to matches which swung back and forth with alarming consequences for the blood pressure of partisan supporters. Rarely were the games dull.

But for me, the thrilling stories to come out of the Tests were the emergence of Ross Taylor and Stuart Broad, who started the campaign as rookies and ended as established players.

Taylor is the best batting prospect New Zealand have had since Martin Crowe. We are liable to hear a lot about how he bats in Twenty20 mode, but all that means is that he plays as many outrageously ambitious shots as a Kevin Pietersen or Adam Gilchrist – or, to mention some people who played Test cricket long before anyone had even mooted Twenty20, the three Ws, Viv Richards or Ian Botham.

His 154* at Old Trafford was the innings of the back-to-back series. Granted, he had early assistance from the waywardness of Anderson, but that merely got him off and running. It was an innings of clean hitting, thoroughly demoralising for the bowlers, and it should have won the match.

I found his tour diary interesting, revealing a player very keen on extracting the maximum education from each match. Unless he succumbs to the Kiwi fondness for frequent and bizarre injuries, Taylor will soon be one of the game’s major stars.

What Stuart Broad will become is a lot less certain. He is a decent enough bowler, but he’s impressed me more as a Test batsman. He may yet add a yard of pace and learn to do more with the ball, but he does not pose all that many problems for a Test batsman who is content to work him around. He is learning: you watch him after he’s been hit and he is not cursing his luck or the batsman but pondering how it happened and what he can do to avoid it next time. Even so, as a pure bowler, he does not deserve his place in the side yet.

Having him at number eight, though, means that we have more than filled the hole left by the much-maligned Ashley Giles, the value of whose tenacity while Thorpes or Pietersens completed centuries only became clear once he had gone. In the longer term, I can easily see Broad moving up to seven and then six; his technique is that of a top-order batsman, even if the results are not quite there yet.

Two special cricketers, Broad and Taylor. It’s been fascinating to watch them emerge, and I’m looking forward to seeing a lot more of them in years to come.

Comments (9)
Posted by: James at July 8, 2008 12:58 PM

Good overview, Mike. I certainly look forward to seeing how Taylor shapes up. You're a little harsh on Broad's bowling, though, both in terms of his impact so far and his potential. OK, his average isn't up to much, but a couple of his spells had a genuine impact on the course of the game. His stated aim is to become a McGrath-like bowler. Ambitious, yes, but certainly the right idea. Both McGrath and Pollock have demonstrated that modern Test bowlers don't necessarily need express pace or a bag of tricks in order to be effective. I would, however, agree with you in the sense that I'd prefer to see him as part of a five-man attack. England's current quartet has done well, but I don't rate their chances against a strong batting side and/or on a flat pitch. Throw a Flintoff and/or a Jones into the mix and the missing ingredients (pace, aggression, reverse-swing) would be there.

Posted by: Stephen Gelb at July 8, 2008 1:45 PM

nice piece, Mike. Your suggestion of low standards gives me (more) hope for the upcoming series. I've not seen much of Broad, but from what you say, is the new Flintoff?

Posted by: Mike Holmans at July 8, 2008 9:55 PM

Thanks, James and Stephen for the compliments.

Broad is a cricketer of immense potential. He is a good bowler, but he is not one of the three best pace bowlers in England. Yet. Therefore he is not yet worth his place in the side purely as a bowler.

He is not the new Flintoff: Fred is a power hitter (though not powerful enough to get Lancashire through to T20 finals day - Dawid Malan is my hero, fala-lala-lah-lala-la-la-la!), while Broad bats like a "proper" batsman. Fred bowls fast, Broad seems unlikely even to try and be a 90mph bowler.

If his bowling gets better, he could be the new Shaun Pollock, but if his batting is as good as I think it might be, he could be the new Kallis.

I'd prefer him not to set his ambitions so pitifully low, but emulating either of those would do as a start.

Posted by: karl at July 8, 2008 11:42 PM

Nice piece Mike. I think the two series came away with the right results. To me, New Zealand is a team with a handful of quality players - Vettori, McCullum and now Taylor, that punch above their weight as a side (more so in ODI's). England are a side full of stars that frequently under perform - especially in ODI's.

In saying that, the outlook looks good for England, the likes of Broad, Cook and even Bopara, look like they have the package to become very good players. New Zealand have Southee, Taylor and How to look forward to, however the gaping hole Fleming left still seams along way off filling.

I look forward to the South African series to see how England fear against a more quality test side.

Posted by: mystery at July 9, 2008 4:37 AM

nice piece of writing mike, maybe including a bit about the ODI series' wouldnt help though? also a bit more of an analysis on players other than broad and taylor

Posted by: Stephen Gelb at July 9, 2008 7:56 AM

Who IS Dawid Malan? and what are his SA connections? He appears to have some talent. I read he was born in England but raised in SA. Is he still eligible for SA? Maybe once we go 3-0 we should include him for the last test to keep him ours. :)

Posted by: Mike Holmans at July 9, 2008 10:40 AM

I know nothing much about Malan. I hadn't seen him play for Middx before the T20 - he'd only played one game for the first XI, in May against Essex in the Friends Provident, and I didn't go.
I assumed he was a Kolpakker, and was surprised to learn he was English-born.

Apparently he played for Boland in 2006 before joining Middx.

I would imagine that he would be chary of making himself an overseas player and thus in danger of being unemployable by Middx, though.

Posted by: Auchi, Sri Lanka at July 9, 2008 12:18 PM

Good overview, I found it very informative. I've always admired Ross Taylor, not merely for his cricket, but his determination, dedication and positive outlook. As for Broad, reading this gave me somrthing to think about. Thank you.

Posted by: vivek venkataram at July 10, 2008 12:25 PM

Very interesting overview here by Mr.Mike but i fail to understand why a top order failure which indirectly means high standards of new ball bowling,good lower order performances from bowling all rounders and a series in which at least 3 matches went down to the wire result in comments like quality of cricket has been low.Quality of cricket cannot be identified only through the success or failure of the big top order players.Overall quality is very essential and if the the matches were watched keenly one would notice that the contests were quite good and performane was definitely not anywhere near "LOW".As for Stuart Broad it is yet to be seen how he performs against the likes of steyn,ntini and morkel.His bowling is suitable for overcast conditions and will be challenged in dry wickets of the sub continent! Dawid Malan played an outstanding innings in the quarter finals.Having watched the innings i should say it was the perfect t20 innings as he started off nudging and then xploded!!

Name: Email Address:
Comments: characters left
Shanaka Amarasinghe
Shanaka Amarasinghe Shanaka Amarasinghe Possessing the best disguised googly in Sri Lanka (because no one has ever really seen it), Shanaka is the finest legspinner to never have played top-level cricket. He is a popular cricket analyst and host of The Score, the No. 1-rated, if slightly infamous, sports show on radio in Sri Lanka. While in England playing rugby, he earned his LLM at King’s College and is a lawyer by training if not inclination. He is also an actor, a journalist, a writer, and thinks he is a comedian.
Mike Holmans
Mike HolmansMike Holmans, a database consultant by profession, has spent thirty summers (and a few winters) going to the cricket. Brought up in one and working in the other, his dearest wish is for a season to end with Yorkshire winning the county championship by beating runners-up Middlesex by one wicket with five minutes to go. If it’s also a summer when England win the Ashes, so much the better.
Michael Jeh
Michael JehMichael Jeh Born in Colombo, educated at Oxford and now living in Brisbane, Michael Jeh (Fox) is a cricket lover with a global perspective on the game. An Oxford Blue who played first-class cricket, he is a Playing Member of the MCC and still plays grade cricket. Michael now works closely with elite athletes, and is passionate about youth intervention programmes. He still chases his boyhood dream of running a wildlife safari operation called Barefoot in Africa.
Saad Shafqat
Saad ShafqatSaad Shafqat takes special pride that his cricket-watching life began during the three-month interval between Javed Miandad's debut Test in Lahore and Imran Khan's 12-wicket haul at Sydney. Although a practicing neurologist based in Karachi, cricket has never been far from his activities. He has co-authored Javed Miandad’s autobiography Cutting Edge and has been a contributor to Cricinfo since 2005. His regular column Reverse Swing appears fortnightly in Dawn, Pakistan’s leading English daily.
Latest News
Specials
© ESPN EMEA Ltd