| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
« Wake up call for West Indies | Coach or boffin? »
March 18, 2009Posted by Mike Holmans on 03/18/2009 in Mike Holmans
What should the ECB do next summer?
![]()
| ||
The ECB are getting themselves in a lather about Kent signing Stuart Clark to play county cricket before the Ashes, stopping only just short of seeking an indictment of the Kent Committee on charges of high treason. What nonsense, not to mention piffle, poppycock, balderdash and claptrap.
This is the same ECB which was very pleased when last year the New Zealanders allowed Jimmy Anderson to play some state cricket to help him recover from injury, following which he got picked for the Second Test and ripped through the New Zealand top order as England went on to win the match and then the series.
This is the same ECB which arranged an England Performance Squad tour of India to coincide with the senior team’s tour before Christmas, a transparent way of making sure they would have a pool of reserves fit and acclimatised if they suddenly needed someone to step in (otherwise what was Michael Vaughan doing in the party?). It could not have been organised without the good offices of the BCCI, who did not turn the idea down on the grounds that it might help the visitors win a match or two – not that it did, but that is hardly the BCCI’s fault.
The Australians are double-dyed villains who won’t let Poms play in their precious Shield competition so why should we be nice to them, goes the line from some people. But Shield cricket isn’t the only game in Australia: when Ray Illingworth failed to pick him for the 1994-95 Ashes tour, Gus Fraser arranged himself a gig to play grade cricket with Western Suburbs – and was in the England Test team for the Third Test.
Fraser himself is on a subsidiary indictment now because Middlesex, where he is the new director of cricket, have signed Phil Hughes for the early part of the season. But Hughes has been signed to fill in for Owais Shah, whom the ECB have seen fit to allow to swan off to India to play in the IPL, an offer which Hughes turned down. Perhaps the ECB should have put their foot down about IPL stints rather than whingeing when counties respond by signing the best replacements they can.
It says little for the ECB’s confidence in its team if how the opposition prepare is an issue even worth commenting on, let alone vituperating about. It may be understandable, given that the only team to lose the First Test of a series to England in the last four years was Bangladesh, but the obvious fact that the ECB are incapable of preparing a side which is ready when a series starts is a poor excuse for trying to sabotage opponents.
Sure, winning the Ashes is the best thing that can happen to an England team. No other cricket contest reaches into the collective national unconscious the same way or stirs as many young players to redouble their efforts to get good enough to win an Ashes series themselves. But sticking artificial obstacles in the Aussies’ path is a pathetic way to try and engineer it.
So I wholeheartedly agreed when Gus said to Cricinfo, "What should the ECB do next summer? Abolish all comforts for the Australians ahead of the Ashes? Put them in dirty hotels and make them travel on a rickety, old school bus with springs coming out of the seats? No, you want a situation like in 2005, where you had two teams at the top of their games battling each other, and hopefully England coming out on top."
You tell ‘em, Gus!
Nicely put Mike. Its indeed quite pathetic of ECB to try and rig its own rules just to engineer an Ashes victory. To the credit of ECB, the country game has always been well organised and served as a learning ground for overseas cricketers. I think the Pakistanis and West Indians benefited the most. Now there arent many young Pakistanis and West Indians fine tuning their techniques and temperaments and world cricket is worse off for it. It didnt necessarily improve English cricket though.
I am a bit confused about the idea that English players cant play sheffield shield. I'm not aware why not. Andy Flower did, a pakistani (sorry cant remember who) did just this summer for south australia, and of course graham thorpe signed with NSW at the end of his career but didnt get a game. If their players arent good enough to get a game, or the shield doesnt pay well enough, or aussie teams won't pick a player who wants to play a couple of games, or because the "fringe" english players wouldnt actually get a game in the shield, thats a lesson to england.
Its not like our state teams are all about the national team - Victoria just won the shield with a team at least half of whom are over 30 - hardly in the long term interests of Australian test team.
Oh and Darren Pattinson, you know the english swing bowler, played one game for the vics this year.
Its not our fault that he doesnt get a game!
I wonder if anyone has asked Mr Morris and Mr Miller of the ECB just how many of their cricketers they think would actually be good enough to play in the Sheffield Shield competition? Then ask the chief selectors for the various states the same question and compare the answers?
The Shield selectors are not stupid people, if a player was good enough to be selected then they would be selected. Simple as that. Whilst Australia hasn't had a lot of imports over the years, there have been some memorable imports play in the Shield competition over the years. Some of those imports were: - Russ Surty, Ian Botham, Graeme Hick, Imran Khan and lately Younus Khan to name a few.
I think the ECB should take a collective valium and take a reality check.
The ECB could always employ someone to drop cricket balls in his path everywhere he goes - Opportunity knocks! Well said Messrs Holmans and Fraser.
Hi Mike
I agree that people including the ECB should stop fretting about Stuart Clark and Hughes playing some county cricket prior to the Ashes.
The ECB would be better advised to put it's energies and focus this summer into ensuring that England go into the Ashes with a) a world class coach and b) the best possible option for the captaincy. I believe this to be Pietersen because he is the only one that can psychologically intimidate the Australians and the only person in the England camp that the Asutralians genuinally fear.
I agree that
I think Glenn is right on the money here. I'm quite sure that English players would be picked in Shield teams if the players were there and the selectors thought they were appreciably better than the available local talent--surely these are fair criteria?
Who around the current England set-up would actually get a game for a state team? Flintoff and Pietersen for sure, Strauss and Vaughan (if he shows some form with Yorks) possibly. As heath said, thopse on the fringes--and some regulars too--simply wouldn't be picked, on the basis that they're not good enough.
As many players have found out, they'd be welcomed into Grade cricket though, which (definitely in Sydney and to a large extent Brisbane; I don't know about other cities) is of a comparable standard to 2nd XI (and possibly 2nd Division) County cricket. England were regularly picking Geraint Jones just before and after he was struggling to get a game in 1st grade in Brisbane.
And Strauss played for an NZ state last winter too.
another pathetic attempt by ECB to generate publicity for a cricket series which is deemed to be a mediocre affair. I would rather watch NZ vs West Indies than watching ashes. Its no better than aussies taking on Bangladesh
We could moan about the Aussies coming into County Cricket, but I dare say the likes of Amjad Khan and Robbie Joseph of Kent could learn quite a lot from Stuart Clark - how much poorer would county cricket have been without Hadlee, Rice, Richards (Viv and Barry!), Sobers, Langer, Warne, Imran, LeRoux, Steyn etc. It may seem like we are helping the Aussies a bit, but all's fair in love and war!
Shanaka Amarasinghe Possessing the best disguised googly in Sri Lanka (because no one has ever really seen it), Shanaka is the finest legspinner to never have played top-level cricket. He is a popular cricket analyst and host of The Score, the No. 1-rated, if slightly infamous, sports show on radio in Sri Lanka. While in England playing rugby, he earned his LLM at King’s College and is a lawyer by training if not inclination. He is also an actor, a journalist, a writer, and thinks he is a comedian.
Mike Holmans, a database consultant by profession, has spent thirty summers (and a few winters) going to the cricket. Brought up in one and working in the other, his dearest wish is for a season to end with Yorkshire winning the county championship by beating runners-up Middlesex by one wicket with five minutes to go. If it’s also a summer when England win the Ashes, so much the better.
Michael Jeh Born in Colombo, educated at Oxford and now living in Brisbane, Michael Jeh (Fox) is a cricket lover with a global perspective on the game. An Oxford Blue who played first-class cricket, he is a Playing Member of the MCC and still plays grade cricket. Michael now works closely with elite athletes, and is passionate about youth intervention programmes. He still chases his boyhood dream of running a wildlife safari operation called Barefoot in Africa.
Saad Shafqat takes special pride that his cricket-watching life began during the three-month interval between Javed Miandad's debut Test in Lahore and Imran Khan's 12-wicket haul at Sydney. Although a practicing neurologist based in Karachi, cricket has never been far from his activities. He has co-authored Javed Miandad’s autobiography Cutting Edge and has been a contributor to Cricinfo since 2005. His regular column Reverse Swing appears fortnightly in Dawn, Pakistan’s leading English daily.