| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
« Whose culture? Whose failure? | Where is the justice? »
March 3, 2010Posted by Samir Chopra on 03/03/2010 in Samir Chopra
Walking in an umpire's shoes
|
| How tough is it to deal with the stress of giving a decision under stress? © Associated Press |
Like every single cricket fan on this planet, I've cursed umpires and given the finger to the gentlemen who give my heroes the digital salute. But I like to think I've grown (just a little bit) out of my previously immature reactions to them. For willy-nilly, I took Atticus Finch's advice, and walked around in an umpire's shoes. And from then on, I never viewed umpiring in the same light.
In my university days, I played a bit of casual cricket with my mates at college. Nothing too serious; our talents were limited. But Hindu College, my alma mater, was a cricketing powerhouse in the Delhi cricket scene, and there were plenty of stars to watch up close and admire. The concentration of cricketing talent in our institution meant the inter-departmental competition often afforded some of the best cricket viewing of the year. We could get close to the action, and we could see players that were Ranji, and possibly India, aspirants. The strongest departments (History, Political Science, Economics, General Arts) were packed with members from the college team. (Unsurprisingly, the sciences were left to fight for the scraps).
One fine morning, a group of us gathered to watch Political Science take on General Arts (Indian folks will know the latter better as "the BA (Pass) boys"). The games were 40-overs a side and approximately ten players from the college side were out there in the middle, playing for the two departments.
A few overs into the game, one of the fielders trotted over to us (down at long-off) with a request. One of the umpires had to go off for a family emergency; would one of us agree to umpire? (I hasten to point out the reason the fielder had picked us was because we knew him from some friendly games earlier in the season). I eagerly volunteered; umpiring seemed like a great way to get into the thick of the action and watch it up close.
A few minutes later, I had started to regret my decision. The action out on the middle felt fast and furious; the fielders were aggressive and hortatory; a fast bowler who was constantly over-stepping didn't appreciate my no-balling; and the fielding side's captain, who came on to bowl his off-spinners, was a pesky, inquisitive, irritating type, who kept moving me around.
I was surrounded by young men, older, and bigger (make that much bigger) than me. It was noisy and even the unambiguous sounds I expected to hear out in the middle were not so clear. Bat against cloth, pad against ball, pad buckles against bat, ball against body; the sounds were a little potpourri of clicks and nips.
I felt a buzzing in my head; I was keeping track of too many things, and was worn down by the stress of feeling I might get things wrong. And I did. A batsman went down to sweep the off-spinner; the ball had pitched on off and middle. He had plonked his leg down the pitch; the ball would have spun past leg. I was worn out. I raised the finger. He glared; I averted my eyes.
Shortly thereafter, I asked to be relieved of my duties. I wanted to be back on the sidelines, smoking a cigarette, sipping a cup of tea, soaking up the beautiful Delhi winter sun. I didn't want to be hassled and harried out in the middle. I wanted to enjoy the game, damn it all.
I think my experience is instructive and it forms the basis of the following modest proposal.
An international cricketer could do with a little apprenticeship in umpiring as part of his graduation to the highest form the game. The Don studied for, and passed, an umpire's exam. In similar fashion, I propose that a pre-condition for playing in a Test should be that the player in question should have umpired in a few games; perhaps first-class games, perhaps something a level just below. (Australians could consider umpiring in the city grade competitions, for instance)
They should stand for a few days in the sun and properly soak up the hurly-burly an umpire experiences. They should experience, in no particular order: the stress of giving a decision under stress; being pressured by constant appealing; feeling like all eleven men in the fielding side dislike you and multi-tasking that would put a modern computing architecture to shame.
Perhaps then, with their felt experience of an umpire's lot under their belts, they might experience some empathy for the lot of those who "only stand and wait."
Wonderful article. Some people may wonder why all this struggle in this high tech age but being an umpire is the hardest job on the field. A batsman can misread Murali's doosra but an umpire cant or else risk having to face a pair of big popping eyes. Somewhere down the line, people forget that umpires are humans and cant get everything right. Asking cricketers to be umpires, though far fetched, will surely teach everyone to look at things from an umpire's perspective. And finally for all those calling for umpires to be replaced by TV cameras, why dont we replace bowlers by bowling machines, batsmen by automated bats and fielders by computer programmed robots.
I think this is why the umpires in cricket have traditionally been older, wiser and respected men. I am sure, the guy you replaced, did not feel the same way as you did, cause at the time he was more suited for the task.
In any case, like most things in cricket, umpiring is also a specialist's job and it should remain that way.
Although the idea of letting test players umpire in a few club games sounds good, its not practical with the amount of cricket they play nowadays.
Good suggestion.
Also, 5 run penalties for "bad" appeals.
I think it's fairly standard in Aus to expect captains to do the umpiring exam simply for knowledge of the laws. Some experience could help as well, but dumping Test wanna-bes on the grade cricket as umpires might be more than is necessary. I also suspect the players (with exceptions) are more understanding of the umpires than most fans to start with.
Couldn't agree with you more. In fact, international umpires also have the pressure of touring the cricket-world for more days in a year than their predecessors. That needs to be appreciated by players and fans alike. Somebody like a Simon Taufel may be able to manage, but it was equally admirable how Shep at his age used to officiate in India without so much as a fuss. Umpires must be competent, yes. But the cricket administration must consider the rigours of travel-related stress too. Maybe intl. umpiring must be incentivised too and compensation increased, so that former intl. cricketers who are knowledgeable and acquainted with travelling take to officiating, rather than plain-banter commentary.
Good on you, Samir, well done.
I am an umpire in the top grade of Sydney Grade Cricket as well as the Public Relations Officer for the NSW Cricket Umpires & Scorers.
I have recently posted some interviews with top umpires, including Darrell Hair, on You Tube under the moniker of TheCricketBuff.
Take a look at them, you may find them of interest. All the best,
Nick
Very well written.
Whatever the challemges I would not like to be an umpire - goiod article BTW
Good article. I umpire at club grade and captain a C grade club side. I can carry on with my daily chorse after a day as a captain on the field, but feel exausted after a day umpiring! It has helped me understand the stress that the umpires have to go through. I support the idea of captains or senior players having to umpire grade games once or twice a year.
This is an interesting article. Thanks for sharing.
great experience, dude! thanks for this great
Articles wow... it's very wonderful report.
Nice article. Thank you for this info
Shanaka Amarasinghe Possessing the best disguised googly in Sri Lanka (because no one has ever really seen it), Shanaka is the finest legspinner to never have played top-level cricket. He is a popular cricket analyst and host of The Score, the No. 1-rated, if slightly infamous, sports show on radio in Sri Lanka. While in England playing rugby, he earned his LLM at King’s College and is a lawyer by training if not inclination. He is also an actor, a journalist, a writer, and thinks he is a comedian.
Mike Holmans, a database consultant by profession, has spent thirty summers (and a few winters) going to the cricket. Brought up in one and working in the other, his dearest wish is for a season to end with Yorkshire winning the county championship by beating runners-up Middlesex by one wicket with five minutes to go. If it’s also a summer when England win the Ashes, so much the better.
Michael Jeh Born in Colombo, educated at Oxford and now living in Brisbane, Michael Jeh (Fox) is a cricket lover with a global perspective on the game. An Oxford Blue who played first-class cricket, he is a Playing Member of the MCC and still plays grade cricket. Michael now works closely with elite athletes, and is passionate about youth intervention programmes. He still chases his boyhood dream of running a wildlife safari operation called Barefoot in Africa.
Saad Shafqat takes special pride that his cricket-watching life began during the three-month interval between Javed Miandad's debut Test in Lahore and Imran Khan's 12-wicket haul at Sydney. Although a practicing neurologist based in Karachi, cricket has never been far from his activities. He has co-authored Javed Miandad’s autobiography Cutting Edge and has been a contributor to Cricinfo since 2005. His regular column Reverse Swing appears fortnightly in Dawn, Pakistan’s leading English daily.