| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
« This one's for Pakistan | LBWs should not be reviewed »
August 26, 2008Posted on 08/26/2008 in Extras
Boundary for advertisers
From T Ali, Pakistan
I don't know if this issue has been looked into before, but I feel that the advertising hoardings are, most of the times, far too close to the boundary. Now it may seem justified, that anything outside the boundary rope has no relevance to how far away it is. Common examples are the dug-outs in Twenty20 games, the white uniformed kids who run around to pick up a dispatched ball and return it to the closest fielder. But the most interfering thing are the advertising hoardings.
I have been observing for quite a while that boundaries are conceded because the fielder chasing the call indulges in second thoughts on whether to dive or not with the hoardings 2-3 feet away from the rope. Most of the times, the fielder in question decides against diving and thus avoiding a high risk of getting injured. This, of course, robs the fielder of any chances of saving a run or two, which might have been saved, had the hoardings been a little farther.
This is not the case in every ground in the world, but I'd like to mention Taunton as one ground where this problem exists. I, by chance, watched a Pro40 match on TV which was played at this ground, and several would-have-been-stopped boundaries were conceded. Finally, I'd want to say that It'd be a good idea if a distance of 5 meters would be allowed between the rope and the hoardings. Doing that, we'd play it fair with the fielders.
Posted by: Dave at August 27, 2008 3:54 PM
Maybe fielders are denied the chance to dive and save some runs by ropes being relatively close to advertising hoardings, but having the rope there in the first instance deprives the fielder of the chance of taking a catch.
Put the boundaries back out to give the bowlers and fielders a chance of taking a wicket; I'm sure most fielding sides would gladly give up a few runs an innings for an extra wicket.
And regarding possible injury: If you're too close to the hoardings, don't dive. Simple, and it's the same for both teams. Don't hurl yourself at a solid object and you won't get injured. I suspect Charles Darwin would have something to say about that.
Posted by: T Ali at August 27, 2008 5:38 PM
Dave, having more distance between the rope and the hoardings doesn't necessarily mean the rope have to be pulled in. The rope can stay there, but the hoardings need to be pushed back.
Now, I don't know who gets the revenue generated by these ads, but I think they keep them close to the boundary to allow the ads appear on screen more frequently. A prime example of the sport becoming more about money.
Take a look at football and other sports, where diving is needed to keep the ball in the field of play. Their hoardings are miles out.
Posted by: T Ali at August 27, 2008 5:39 PM
Dave, having more distance between the rope and the hoardings doesn't necessarily mean the rope have to be pulled in. The rope can stay there, but the hoardings need to be pushed back.
Now, I don't know who gets the revenue generated by these ads, but I think they keep them close to the boundary to allow the ads appear on screen more frequently. A prime example of the sport becoming more about money.
Take a look at football and other sports, where diving is needed to keep the ball in the field of play. Their hoardings are miles out.
Posted by: T Ali at August 27, 2008 5:40 PM
Dave, having more distance between the rope and the hoardings doesn't necessarily mean the rope have to be pulled in. The rope can stay there, but the hoardings need to be pushed back.
Now, I don't know who gets the revenue generated by these ads, but I think they keep them close to the boundary to allow the ads appear on screen more frequently. A prime example of the sport becoming more about money.
Take a look at football and other sports, where occasional diving is needed to keep the ball in the field of play. Their hoardings are miles out.
The Inbox will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing.
- The myth of ‘bowling in the right areas’
- Cricket in a global village
- Why a Test Championship is flawed
- Test cricket in India - The way forward
- The parallel tales of two writer-cricketers
- Who is New Zealand's best after Hadlee?
- Building up to Boxing Day
- Sehwag and the circle of the seasons
- Bangladesh are going backwards
- Pakistan's welcome turnaround