The Inbox

April 10, 2010
Posted on 04/10/2010 in English cricket
An underrated English hero

From James Adams-Pace, United Kingdom

He may not have the speed of Brett Lee or the glamour of Kevin Pietersen, but Matthew Hoggard was a truly English champion and never let anyone down © Getty Images

His run-up begins with a movement that is a cross between a trot and a shuffle, an action fitting for his appearance. Then he energetically runs in, mane straggling in the wind, pounding the ground with heavy footsteps. This bustling finally culminates in his last act: the release. With a cocked wrist, bent right limb, and leading arm slanted across his body, he whips the ball round, planting it on a good length.

Typically, the left-handed batsman, thinking the ball will innocuously wander down the off-side, is lulled into a false sense of security, only to be surprised by the prodigious swing once the ball has pitched. With his feet misplaced and bat hanging out from their body, the batsman observes in disbelief as the ball strikes his pads or collides with his off stump.

With his two index fingers raised, he celebrates in a similar style to how he ran in, his hair suitably being ruffled by his team-mates this time. This, for the first few years of my cricketing life, was the best sight in English cricket. This is the magic of Matthew Hoggard. While the likes of Andrew Flintoff and Steve Harmison stole the headlines, Hoggard was always the bowler upon whom England could rely, evident in his superior bowling average to his peers and number of wickets taken (with 248, he stands a mighty sixth in the list of England’s all-time leading wicket-takers).

However, there was so much more to Hoggie than numbers; his bowling had an indomitable air about it: no matter what the conditions were or who the opponent was, he would keep running in, endeavouring to take a wicket, never meekly surrendering to a challenge. Critics say that he was ineffective when conditions did not favour swing, but that never stopped him trying, and as his seven-wicket haul in Australia suggests, he eventually combated those limitations.

He was also stoic night-watchman, and scorer of the most important four in England’s Test history (who can forget that boundary he scored off of Brett Lee’s bowling at Trent Bridge?) He played with dignity, character and a smile for England, and the ECB’s treatment of him was outrageous. After years of unswerving service, opening the bowling with acclaim, he was dropped to make way for younger players. In any other line of work, Hoggard probably could have sued, but, instead, he returned to his county and showed England just what they were missing.

If there was one thing that Hoggard showed me, it was that you do not have to be the fastest, tallest, or meanest to be a fantastic fast bowler. Instead, consistency, effort, and perspiration win over eventually, too. He may not have the speed of Lee or the glamour of Kevin Pietersen, but Hoggard was a truly English champion and never let anyone down. He may not have been the best in the world, but he was good enough to be my hero.

Comments (9)
Posted by: Voice of Reason at April 10, 2010 12:22 PM

Funny how Hoggy is always slated as 'undeerrated'. I suggest it was the media who always underrated him, cos amongst the England fans he was a hero, and opposition batsmen treated him with an amount of respect. Bit of a tired ol cliche of an article really

Posted by: sathya narayanan at April 10, 2010 1:24 PM

I am not an Englishman but I've always enjoyed watching him bowl and have always liked his hardwork...

Posted by: abid ali at April 11, 2010 2:16 AM

i am a pakistani fan,but really,the sight of hoggard coming in to bowl with his swing was awesome and i feel he has been let down by the ECB.after that historic win against the aussies in 2005 the quartet pace attack of harmison,hoggard,flintoff and one onther should have remained they were so dominant against the aussies with a great variety,reverse swing conventionl swing,height of harmisonmand of course the great flintoff.

Posted by: Moin at April 11, 2010 3:21 AM

generally the english bowlers of 90s and 2000s were a piece of crap. The only exception being Hoggard. A gentleman he is, he gives his best anytime.

I still remember, he was the only bowler who smiles even after being hit for runs. he should be given another chance to be back in the team.

Posted by: Kunal Talgeri at April 11, 2010 5:48 AM

Hoggard was a joy to watch indeed. And I loved him for being as forthright as he was, off the field. Am trying to lay my hands on his autobio. Nice ode to a jovial cricketer. Hope he does great at Leicester this year.

Posted by: Soham at April 11, 2010 5:51 AM

I remember the test series between India n England in 2004.. Hoggard bowling unplayable deliveries one after the other to Rahul Dravid at Headingly.. Dravid missing 90% of the away-swinging deliveries, and somehow managing to survive those horrible swinging sessions.. Hoggard didn't give an inch, when the other bowlers were wilting away in the face of dogged resistance from "the Wall".. Only Hoggard had the heart to bowl in the face of unyielding Indian batting resistance..

Although not as flashy as Simon Jones, not as tall/intimidating as Harmison, not a darling of the English masses like Flintoff, he was the architect of some of the finest swing bowling that England have produced in the last 10-15 years.
His treatment was often compared with that meted out to Javagal Srinath when he retired. Only difference is, Srinath was able to keep his presence alive even after retirement.. I wish Hoggard also had been felicitated by the ECB like FLintoff.. A true Gladiator he was!

Posted by: Alfred Moore at April 13, 2010 9:01 PM

Well said! Hoggard has been my favourite cricketer of the last decade, and he rarely gets enough credit. He had the determination and skill to make himself the kind of bowler who routinely excelled on dead pitches as well as greentops. As for the hacks who said he'd 'lost his nip', it's worth pointing out that he never did bowl fast, and that speed is a lot less important than skill and control.

It's a crying shame that England treated him so shabbily. I'm sure he would have remained the most effective English seamer, and if Chamida Vaas is anything to go by, he could still have a few more years at the top. England's (and Yorkshire's) loss is Leicester's gain.

Posted by: Vivek at April 15, 2010 8:45 PM

There are always these nice guys who often get to go unnoticed like Hoggard and Srinath, but its baffling as to how these guys get ignored by the boards too.

Posted by: MartinAmber at April 17, 2010 2:10 PM

I appreciate this tribute to Hoggard. Surprisingly you don't mention what I'd say first: that he produced, in January 2005 at Johannesburg, the greatest individual performance by an England bowler in 25 years and (for my money) the greatest match performance by any England cricketer (yes, including Flintoff!) in the 2000s. I thought he was poorly treated by the England management in 2008, a feeling intensified for life by the selection of Darren Pattinson at Hoggard's former home ground that summer. Not sure where Moin is coming from describing Flintoff, Steve Harmison and Simon Jones as a "piece of crap": a bowling attack offering that much variation that wins a long series against the best side of the last 20 years is the sort of crap any country would take.

Name: Email Address:
Comments: characters left
The Inbox will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing.
Latest News
Specials
© ESPN EMEA Ltd