| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
« Nets provide more frustration for Flintoff | Powerful Tait finds his place »
March 30, 2007Posted on 03/30/2007 in Miscellaneous
Cover-up a viewer turn-off
Batsmen may be happier and safer wearing helmets, but, according to the Sydney Morning Herald, they prevent fans seeing the batsmen's faces, which, market research has found, makes it hard for them to relate to the players.
But, as Philip Derriman notes, it’s not all gloom.
If they're bad for TV, they're about the only thing in cricket that is. In other respects, cricket is a broadcaster's dream. It lasts all day; the main action is concentrated in a smallish area; it's essentially a one-on-one (bowler-against-batsman) contest; the game lends itself to endless analysis by commentators; and the short breaks between overs are ideal for slotting in commercials.
- Why the IPL needs an upgrade
- Yuvraj tackles the toughest ball
- Bracewell's cricket journey
- Greg Chappell on ending a lean batting spell
- DRS has changed the game
- It's crunch time for England's top five
- Fleming recalls back-from-dead tales
- Can England retain their top six for Sri Lanka?
- BCCI's high-handedness must stop
- What next for Yuvraj