| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
« Test cricket should learn from Twenty20 | Should one stand or walk? »
June 15, 2008Posted on 06/15/2008 in English cricket
Twenty20 can't do duels
In an impassioned piece for the Sunday Telegraph, Scyld Berry promotes the virtues of Test cricket and all its intricacies over the brief but glitzy Twenty20.
It is above all in duels within the team game - Warne v Flintoff, or McCullum v Panesar, ad infinitum - that a player's character is revealed, and Twenty20 has no time for duels: after a couple of bad overs, a batsman or bowler is out. Test cricket shapes and displays a player's essential self; in Twenty20, which is all action and no drama, he is little more than a robot. He has therefore to play in the former to be marketable in the latter. Sir Viv, one of the Stanford courtiers at Lord's, would never have done what he did for the identity of Afro-Caribbean people if he had played only Twenty20.