| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
« An inevitable KP century | Dinesh Chandimal: Challenging the destiny »
August 10, 2008Posted on 08/10/2008 in India in Sri Lanka 2008
Referrals: Not absolute, but accurate
The referral system is conceptually very good if the technology assisting the eye is foolproof, writes Pradeep Magazine in the Hindustan Times.
The Indians have been at the receiving end of most of the referrals and there have been reports that players are not happy with some of the verdicts that went against them ... But in most cases the right decision based on the technological evidence has been given and that is what should matter in the end. Just because the Indians have got more decisions against them should not be the yardstick to judge the referrals.
- Why the IPL needs an upgrade
- Yuvraj tackles the toughest ball
- Bracewell's cricket journey
- Greg Chappell on ending a lean batting spell
- DRS has changed the game
- It's crunch time for England's top five
- Fleming recalls back-from-dead tales
- Can England retain their top six for Sri Lanka?
- BCCI's high-handedness must stop
- What next for Yuvraj