| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
« WIPA, WICB should work on the root causes | Bell exposes England's lack of depth »
July 26, 2009Posted on 07/26/2009 in English cricket
Does England need a new, bigger cricket stadium?
The crowds are flocking to the grounds for the Ashes, paying as much as 70 pounds for a seat. Jamie Jackson writes in the Observer that even the biggest of England's cricket grounds, Lord's, has only a capacity of 28,000 - less than a third of the likes of the Melbourne Cricket Ground and the Eden Gardens in Kolkata. He examines whether having a newer, larger stadium - or using London's Olympic stadium for cricket - would allow more people to watch the game and at more affordable prices.
- Why the IPL needs an upgrade
- Yuvraj tackles the toughest ball
- Bracewell's cricket journey
- Greg Chappell on ending a lean batting spell
- DRS has changed the game
- It's crunch time for England's top five
- Fleming recalls back-from-dead tales
- Can England retain their top six for Sri Lanka?
- BCCI's high-handedness must stop
- What next for Yuvraj