| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Video & Audio | Games | Mobile | |||||||||||||||||||||
« Laptop-designed plans no match for on-field education | Cricket needs to stop thinking defensively »
February 5, 2010Posted on 02/05/2010 in Ball tampering
Afridi offers food for thought
The resulting uproar over Shahid Afridi's snack has reignited the debate about ball tampering, and in the New Zealand Herald Adam Parore says Pakistan got away with it for 15 or 20 years because no one really knew what was going on.
Clearly, with reverse swing still being apart of test cricket, minor doctoring of the ball is still going on. I don't believe it is possible to get reverse swing without some illegal work on the ball. But it is being done in a way that is actually good for the game, giving the bowlers more chance when batsmen could absolutely dominate.
Along the same lines, David Leggat wonders if Afridi would have opted to take a chomp at the ball had he known a healthy dose of the stuff you clean toilets with might find its way to his stomach.
- It's crunch time for England's top five
- Fleming recalls back-from-dead tales
- Can England retain their top six for Sri Lanka?
- BCCI's high-handedness must stop
- What next for Yuvraj
- India's failed tactics
- Indian trinity at the crossroads
- One-off Tests serve no purpose
- A Test match for the Twitter generation
- The search for a dignified end to a sporting career